· 6/12/1990
Cardet v. Resolution Trust Corp.
Citations
- 563 So. 2d 167
- 1990 WL 78533
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[o]nce a litigant has appeared and is actively defending the main claim, he or she is entitled to notice of all hearings, including hearings on a motion for default,” and that Picchi “should be confined to the situation there specifically discussed”
- concluding “Picchi should be confined to the situation there specifically discussed,” namely to situations where a notice of appearance is filed for purposes of delay
- “The purpose of the rule is to speed the action toward conclusion on the merits where possible, not to expedite litigation by ex parte actions and surprise”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baskin, Jorgenson and Cope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.