Skip to main content
· 6/12/1990

Cardet v. Resolution Trust Corp.

Citations

  • 563 So. 2d 167
  • 1990 WL 78533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[o]nce a litigant has appeared and is actively defending the main claim, he or she is entitled to notice of all hearings, including hearings on a motion for default,” and that Picchi “should be confined to the situation there specifically discussed”
  • concluding “Picchi should be confined to the situation there specifically discussed,” namely to situations where a notice of appearance is filed for purposes of delay
  • “The purpose of the rule is to speed the action toward conclusion on the merits where possible, not to expedite litigation by ex parte actions and surprise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baskin, Jorgenson and Cope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.