Cardenas v. Geico Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no bad faith as a matter of law, despite an express hold-harmless provision in a proposed release contrary to the settlement offer
• “[A]though a bad faith claim derives from and emphasizes the duty of the insurer to the insured, the conduct of a claimant and the claimant’s attorney is relevant to determining the ‘realistic probability of settlement.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).