Carden v. Warren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court’s factual findings will not be disturbed on appeal unless they are “wholly unsupported by the evidence” (punctuation omitted)
• observing that, on appeal from a bench trial, the trial court’s factual findings will not be disturbed “unless they are clearly erroneous or wholly unsupported by the evidence” (punctuation omitted)
• same; in legitimation proceeding, court abuses its discretion by ignoring best interest of the child in deciding whether to grant request for name change of child
• same; in legitimation proceeding, court abuses its discretion by ignoring best interest of the child in deciding whether to grant request for name change of child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).