Carden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an issue not raised in an appellant’s brief may not be raised for the first time in a reply brief
• holding that the admission of certain hearsay statements constituted fundamental error where such statements were not substantially trustworthy and were “the only evidence used to revoke Carden’s probation”
• holding that the admission of the challenged hearsay testimony constituted fundamental error where the testimony was not substantially trustworthy and was “the only evidence” used to revoke the defendant’s probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).