Fifth Circuit· 12/4/2007
Carden v. General Motors Corp.
Citations
- 509 F.3d 227
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 27977
- 2007 WL 4233686
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the NHTSA identified particular policy reasons for its decision to allow manufacturers the option of selecting between the two seat belt designs, and included this option as part of a comprehensive regulatory scheme”
- finding preemption because the plaintiffs’ claim “would foreclose a deliberate option left to manufacturers under Standard 208, namely the option of installing manual lap-only seat belts”
- discussing the history of FMVSS 208 as it relates to restraints in the rear center seat position during the period applicable to the 1989 Excel in the present case
- tort claims challenging design of seat belts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Demoss, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court· 2010-12-17· cited 143×
- Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2010-01-08· cited 37×
- Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Supreme Court· 2011-02-23· cited 37×
- MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-12-09· cited 28×
- Damian v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-31· cited 26×
- Roland v. General Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-03-03· cited 13×
- Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2008-10-22· cited 9×
- Parks v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-10-20· cited 5×
- Durham Ex Rel. Durham v. County of MauiD. Hawaii· 2010-02-12· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-09-10
- Unnamed caseTexas Supreme Court· 2010-12-17
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-31
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-31
- American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Sarah MilburnTexas Supreme Court· 2024-06-28
- American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Sarah Milburn, John Milburn, and Carolyn MilburnTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2024-06-28
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 903×
- Sprietsma v. Mercury MarineSupreme Court· 2002-12-03· cited 377×
- Pylant v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceFifth Circuit· 2007-08-20· cited 115×
- Frederick A. Hurley and Christine A. Hurley v. Motor Coach Industries, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2000-08-31· cited 110×
- Philip J. Frank v. Delta Airlines Inc., Delta Airlines Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2002-12-03· cited 59×
- Tina Griffith v. General Motors CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2002-08-29· cited 36×
Other cases named Carden v. General Motors Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.