Cardella v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that imposing duties to 23 prevent passengers from performing tortious or criminal acts would have a “chilling effect” on the socially desirable behavior
• reasoning that if designated drivers were imposed with a duty to control intoxicated passengers and prevent them from performing tortious or criminal acts it would have a “chilling effect” on the designated driver movement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).