Cardarelli v. Cardarelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering supplemental briefing on whether application of statutory amendments violated the Ex Post Facto Clause
• This court is duty-bound to follow Supreme Court precedent absent an indication it is departing from that precedent.
• Court of Appeals is duty-bound to follow Supreme Court precedent unless there is some indication that the Supreme Court is departing from its previous position.
• The Kansas Court of Appeals is duty-bound to follow Kansas Supreme Court precedent unless there is some indication that the Supreme Court is departing from its previous position.
• The Kansas Court of Appeals is duty-bound to follow Kansas Supreme Court precedent unless there is some indication that the Supreme Court is departing from its previous position
• The Kansas Court of Appeals is duty bound to follow Kansas Supreme Court precedent unless there is some indication that the Supreme Court is departing from its previous position.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).