Card v. Keffer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no liability for defendant under 1681s-2(b) where “the real issue is whether [the plaintiff] is liable” for the debt[.]”
• no FDCPA claim where plaintiff’s complaint “ma[de] clear that the real issue is whether she [was] liable [for the debt at issue], not whether the defendants engaged in unlawful collection practices”
• “Because the FDCPA is concerned with unlawful debt collection practices, not mere disputes over the legality of the underlying debts, we uphold the district court's dismissal of [the plaintiff’s] claims under the FDCPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).