Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying an ownership in place rule, with the gas developer having the right to drill for and produce CBM and the coal operator having a simultaneous right to capture CBM for safety purposes incident to coal mining operations
• “[T]he transfer of a mineral interest includes, by implication, the incidental rights reasonably necessary to extract the mineral.”
• “[T]he grant of a particular interest in property tacitly carries with the grant those incidents without which the grant would be of no avail.”
• \[T]he grant of a particular interest in property tacitly carries with the grant those incidents without which the grant would be of no avail.\
• right to extract CBM is with holder of gas exploration rights
• right to extract CBM is with holder of gas exploration rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).