Carbajal v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, “as the Vermont Supreme Court did, that Warren Trucking’s rigid framework does not further the remedial purposes of workers’ compensation statutes],]” and “]u]nder Arizona law, compensability turns on the nature of the services, not on the identity of the provider”
• noting palliative use manages “symptoms or mitigat[es] the effects” of illness or injury
• “The compensability of services inquiry should focus on the nature of the services provided, not on the identity of the service provider.”
• § 23-1062(A) not limited to medical care but includes “services to cure or ameliorate the health effects of her injury”
• because the statute makes no distinction as to services provided by a spouse, “[t]he compensability of services inquiry should focus on the nature of the services provided, not on the identity of the service provider”
• Workers’ Compensation Act liberally construed to effectuate remedial purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).