Tenth Circuit· 4/27/1999

Caravalho v. Pugh

Citations

177 F.3d 1177
1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2610
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7971
1999 WL 308520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the remedy provided by § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective only in “extremely limited circumstances”
holding “§ 2265’s substantive and procedural barriers by themselves do not establish that § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective”
noting that the 14 Appellate Case: 20-1418 Document: 010110718991 Date Filed: 08/02/2022 Page: 15 remedy available pursuant to § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective only in “extremely limited circumstances”
unless inadequate or ineffective, a motion for relief under § 2255 is “[t]he exclusive remedy for testing the validity of a judgment and sentence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
“[W]e agree with the district court that the mere fact Caravalho is precluded from filing a § 2255 petition does not establish that the remedy in § 2255 is inadequate.”
“The exclusive remedy for testing the validity of a judgment and sentence, unless it is inadequate or ineffective, is that provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, McKay, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.