Skip to main content
· 5/9/2007

Caracciolo v. Caracciolo

Citations

  • 251 S.W.3d 568
  • 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 7988
  • 2007 WL 1341156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving an almost-identical formula for determining the non-employee spouse’s community-property award
  • husband testified that “high 36” plan was only retirement option and calculated “high 36” based on average base pay during 36 months preceding divorce
  • husband testified that “high 36” plan was only retirement option and calculated “high 36” based on average base pay during 36 months preceding divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Angelini, Hilbig

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.