Carabell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that SWANCC’s holding was narrow and did not require a body of water to directly abut navigable water in order to fall under the jurisdiction of the CWA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).