Caraballo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the defendant's sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum, the defendant was not entitled to postconviction relief under Apprendi
• finding no error in imposing victim injury points that increased the defendant’s sentence because the sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum under section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1997)
• statutory maximum for sexual battery for purposes of Apprendi analysis is that contained in section 775.081

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Long v. Swofford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-03· cited 21×
• McCloud v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-28· cited 19×
• Altman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-23· cited 10×
• Isaac v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-23· cited 5×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-02· cited 5×
• Hindenach v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-13· cited 5×
• Gonsalves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-15· cited 3×
• Ey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-10· cited 3×
• Hughes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-28· cited 3×
• Tschida v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-27· cited 1×
• Schneider v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-08· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Long v. Swofford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-03· cited 21×