Skip to main content
· 9/2/1976

Caputo v. Holt, Administratrix

Citations

  • 217 Va. 302
  • 228 S.E.2d 134
  • 1976 Va. LEXIS 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after appointment of a personal representative, court approval is required to accomplish a binding compromise of such a claim
  • absent court approval acquired in manner provided by law, release executed by first personal representative was not binding upon either successor personal representative or statutory beneficiaries
  • absent court approval acquired in manner provided by law, release executed by first personal representative was not binding upon either successor personal representative or statutory beneficiaries
  • “In light of that purpose, we construe the word ‘may’ as used in the second sentence of this statute to be mandatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.