Skip to main content
· 6/8/1981

Federal Case

Citations

  • 651 F.2d 201
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1309
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “when the expert’s testimony ‘played a crucial role in the resolution of the issues presented,’ a district court, in its discretion, may award expert fees”
  • “[M]ost courts now recognize that restrictions on their subpoena power are no barrier to taxing as costs the travel expenses of a prevailing party's witness who appears from beyond the court's reach.”
  • “district court [has] equitable discretion to award expert fees when the expert’s testimony is indispensable to determination of the case .. . [or] when the expert’s testimony ‘played a crucial role in the resolution of the issues presented’ .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.