Skip to main content
· 4/10/2013

Captain Ross E. Joslyn v. United States

Citations

  • 110 Fed. Cl. 372
  • 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • detecting some tension between the statement of the law in Walls and prior precedent permitting the consideration of new evidence in military pay cases
  • upholding correction board’s fitness determination because plaintiffs OERs were evidence “that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion” (internal quotation omitted)
  • rejecting a disability claim because of satisfactory performance reviews despite injuries
  • the “question is not whether substantial evidence weighs against the [ABCMR’s] decision but whether substantial evidence supports it”
  • “Both the record and the de novo evidence are considered to determine whether the decision of the military disability evaluation board was supported by substantial evidence.” (citing Beckham, 375 F.2d at 785)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hewitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.