Capron v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing plaintiff’s claim against engineer defendant was “based entirely 10 on [the engineer’s] work on the plans and specifications” for the building, so the limitation attached to the date the engineer completed the design
• evaluating whether 5 Unlike Pioneer Homestead, the parties do not dispute the discovery date in our case. 7 damages discovered in 2006, 2007, and 2013 were attributable to the June 1, 2004, design plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).