Capps v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the statutory language, including the term “operate,” consists of “ordinary English words which are commonly and ordinarily understood by people generally, hence the court was not required to define them.”
• explaining that the statutory language, including the term “operate,” consists of “ordinary English words which are commonly and ordinarily understood by people generally, hence the court was not required to define them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kirsch, Scott Alan
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-01-25· cited 725×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-09-19· cited 12×
• Nelson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-03· cited 4×
• James Ray Blake v. Jesse L. Nickerson, III
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-12-07
• Wally Michael Mahoney v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1993-11-17
• Scott Kirsch v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-11-04
• Green, Joseph Lester
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-09-03

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thomas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1955-10-19· cited 13×
• Sandford v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-03-16· cited 10×
• Harrison v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-10-18· cited 5×
• Blackburn v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1913-11-05· cited 2×