Cappiello v. Icd Publications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that party seeking preliminary injunction must satisfy either four part test from Winter or two part test
• noting that a court “should exercise previous law].” Id. at 1324 (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted
• finding that Verizon Business subscribers had standing to challenge the bulk collection program because “the government’s own orders demonstrate that appellants’ 2 call records are indeed among those collected as part of the telephone metadata program”
• describing orders under the NSA program calling for “all call-detail records or ‘telephony metada-ta’ ” of all domestic and international calls
• noting that, even where Congress does not expressly say so, “Congress is presumed to be aware of an administrative or judicial interpretation of a statute and to adopt that interpretation when it reenacts a statute without change” (quotation marks omitted)
• declining to order preliminary in junction in light of national security interests even where success on merits was certain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).