Cappetta v. Hermes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 165a(3)'s reinstatement provision should apply to all dismissals for want of prosecution, including dismissal under court’s inherent power
• holding that Rule 165a(3)’s reinstatement provision should apply to all dismissals for want of prosecution, including dismissal under court’s inherent power
• holding that rule 165a(3)'s standard applied to inherent power-based dismissals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).