· 5/27/1994
Cappello v. Scott
Citations
- 644 A.2d 102
- 274 N.J. Super. 282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that absolute privilege did not apply even though the attorney apparently related a fair account of the complaint to the newspaper
- finding that it is premature to decide application of a qualified privilege prior to completion of discovery
- applying qualified privilege under New Jersey law to press release concerning the litigation
- “no action will lie [for such a qualifiedly privileged statement] except on proof of malice in making it”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Brody, Stern and Keefe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.