Skip to main content
· 12/30/2005

Capozza v. Capozza

Citations

  • 917 So. 2d 365
  • 2005 WL 3555843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding “for a revised scheme of distribution deleting from the schedule of marital assets the twenty shares ... which is to be considered the separate asset of [the husband],” who had received them as a gift from his father

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.