· 12/30/2005
Capozza v. Capozza
Citations
- 917 So. 2d 365
- 2005 WL 3555843
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding “for a revised scheme of distribution deleting from the schedule of marital assets the twenty shares ... which is to be considered the separate asset of [the husband],” who had received them as a gift from his father
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.