Skip to main content

Capodilupo v. Vozzella

Citations

  • 46 Mass. App. Ct. 224
  • 704 N.E.2d 534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where there was actual encroachment of only few inches, this was determined to be “spatially inconsequential” and “truly de minimis”
  • removal of encroachment that is from 3.6 to 4.8 inches over about 30 feet of boundary would endanger structural integrity of a building

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lenk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.