Capobianco v. Mari
Citations
- 272 A.D.2d 497
- 708 N.Y.S.2d 428
- 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5814
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the mere “allegation of a subsequent recurrence of a condition does not abrogate the need for prior written notice”
- finding the mere “allegation of a subsequent recurrence of a condition does not abrogate the need for prior written notice”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lopez v. G&J Rudolph Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-07-18· cited 31×
- McCarthy v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-09-16· cited 29×
- Lopez v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-10-30· cited 11×
- Khemraj v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-02-06· cited 9×
- Carbo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-08-28· cited 8×
- Arias v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-06-11· cited 7×
- Daniels v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-05-02· cited 6×
- Augustine v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-04-11· cited 5×
- Fryc-Cannella v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-04-29· cited 3×
- Littlejohn v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-01-14· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.