Skip to main content
· 10/25/2004

Capo, Inc. v. Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 387 F.3d 1352
  • 73 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1051
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when the objectives of the Declaratory Judgment Act are served, “dismissal is rarely proper”
  • court abused discretion by declining to resolve dispute over which jurisdiction existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Lourie, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.