· 10/25/2004
Capo, Inc. v. Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.
Citations
- 387 F.3d 1352
- 73 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1051
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that when the objectives of the Declaratory Judgment Act are served, “dismissal is rarely proper”
- court abused discretion by declining to resolve dispute over which jurisdiction existed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Lourie, Dyk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.