Skip to main content
· 2/2/1984

Caplinger v. Carter

Citations

  • 676 P.2d 1300
  • 9 Kan. App. 2d 287
  • 1984 Kan. App. LEXIS 295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication even after the plaintiffs claims have been dismissed
  • threshold requirement for tort of outrage is that plaintiff have suffered extreme and sever emotional distress
  • KTCA immunities do not apply to intentional torts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spencer, Harman, Flood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.