Skip to main content
· 9/2/1993

Caplener v. United States National Bank

Citations

  • 857 P.2d 830
  • 317 Or. 506
  • 1993 Ore. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that ORCP 23 C relates back amended pleading that adds “new theories of liability in tort * * * [if they] arose out of the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence alleged in the original pleading”
  • applying judicial estoppel to limit the state law claims of a party who failed to disclose all assets in a bankruptcy proceeding
  • new tort allegations based on bank’s efforts to secure repayment of initial advancements of a loan that it eventually declined to make were insufficiently related to original tort allegations based on bank’s denial of loan
  • debts of party being judicially estopped had been discharged in bankruptcy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vanhoomissen, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.