Skip to main content
· 1/18/2017

Caplash v. Johnson

Citations

  • 230 F. Supp. 3d 128
  • 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7637
  • 2017 WL 222254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Courts read every word in a statute as if it was deliberately chosen and presume that omitted words were excluded purposefully.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.