· 1/18/2017
Caplash v. Johnson
Citations
- 230 F. Supp. 3d 128
- 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7637
- 2017 WL 222254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Courts read every word in a statute as if it was deliberately chosen and presume that omitted words were excluded purposefully.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.