Skip to main content
· 12/8/2010

Capitol Records, LLC v. Bluebeat, Inc.

Citations

  • 765 F. Supp. 2d 1198
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142642
  • 2010 WL 6442438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “it is often unnecessary and impractical” to scrutinize “boilerplate recitations of evidentiary principles or blanket objections” (citation omitted)
  • noting that \it is often unnecessary and impractical\ to scrutinize \boilerplate recitations of evidentiary principles or blanket objections\
  • noting that it was impractical for the court to closely analyze every objection when many of the objections were boilerplate and devoid of any specific analysis
  • observing “it is often 23 unnecessary and impractical for a court to methodically scrutinize each objection and give a full 24 analysis of each argument raised”
  • observing “it is often unnecessary and 16 impractical for a court to methodically scrutinize each objection and give a full analysis of each 17 argument raised”
  • observing “it is often unnecessary and 16 impractical for a court to methodically scrutinize each objection and give a full analysis of each 17 argument raised”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Josephine Staton Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.