Capitol Materials, Inc. v. Kellogg & Kimsey, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney’s letter was sufficient to meet the Statute of Frauds because the letter memorialized the terms of an agreement
• “Forbearance to prosecute a legal claim and the compromise of a doubtful right are both sufficient consideration to support a contract.”
• forbearance to prosecute legal claim and compromise of doubtful right both sufficient consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).