Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an expected or intended injury exclusion did not preclude 10 coverage for an insured corporation in an action for intentional harm by an employee 11 because negligence was not enough to trigger the exclusion
• same, quoting Allstate Ins. Co. v. Russo, 829 F. Supp. 24, 27 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).