Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Strike Zone, S.S.B.&B. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with prior case law that “if a subrogation clause is enforceable, it is the contract terms, and not common law concepts of subrogation, which control”
• the court “de-eline[d] to upset the settled expectations of the parties as reflected in the policy of insurance by overlaying inapplicable equitable principles which contravene the contract terms and forge a new agreement between the parties”
• rejecting claim that insured should be made whole first
• rejecting claim that insured should be made whole first

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).