Skip to main content
· 1/25/1980

Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. Moore

Citations

  • 410 A.2d 184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, by its terms, Title 11 gives this court jurisdiction “to review directly agency action taken only in a contested case.” (emphasis added)
  • under the Landlord-Tenant Code landlord owes a duty to tenants as well as their social guests to maintain stairway in a safe condition
  • Council's grant of appellate court jurisdiction in certain noncontested cases impermissibly altered court's jurisdiction
  • Council’s grant of appellate court jurisdiction in certain noncontested cases impermissibly altered court’s jurisdiction
  • if a claim falls outside of the definition of a contested case, “[a]ny party aggrieved by an agency’s decision may initiate an appropriate equitable action in the Superior Court to seek redress”
  • “[W]e are not foreclosing all review . . . in other noncontested matters . . . . Any party aggrieved by an agency’s decision may initiate an appropriate equitable action in the Superior Court to seek redress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, MacK, Ferren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.