· 1/25/1980
Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. Moore
Citations
- 410 A.2d 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, by its terms, Title 11 gives this court jurisdiction “to review directly agency action taken only in a contested case.” (emphasis added)
- under the Landlord-Tenant Code landlord owes a duty to tenants as well as their social guests to maintain stairway in a safe condition
- Council's grant of appellate court jurisdiction in certain noncontested cases impermissibly altered court's jurisdiction
- Council’s grant of appellate court jurisdiction in certain noncontested cases impermissibly altered court’s jurisdiction
- if a claim falls outside of the definition of a contested case, “[a]ny party aggrieved by an agency’s decision may initiate an appropriate equitable action in the Superior Court to seek redress”
- “[W]e are not foreclosing all review . . . in other noncontested matters . . . . Any party aggrieved by an agency’s decision may initiate an appropriate equitable action in the Superior Court to seek redress.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris, MacK, Ferren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.