Capitol Boulevard Partners v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”
• “‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”
• where a court has made an unlawful order exceeding its authority, mandamus is the proper remedy by which to compel such court to set aside and vacate such order
• where “relator was not a party in the trial court proceedings, was not served summons, and did not appear before the court,” the trial court was “without jurisdiction to render judgment against him”
• “[A] trial court is without jurisdiction to render a judgment or to make findings against a person who was not served summons, did not appear, and was not a party in the court proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).