CAPITAL TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. v. Arias & Arias Consultores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in upholding trial court’s alter-ego finding, that parent company had no employees and that payroll of parent and subsidiary companies was “the same”
• listing five disregard-of-corporate-formalities type facts that rendered entities fused for jurisdictional purposes
• nonresident defendant claimed he negated jurisdictional facts pleaded in plaintiffs petition and appellate court reviewed evidence plaintiff produced in response to nonresident defendant’s special appearance
• refusing to allow speculation to defeat evidence opposing jurisdictional allegations
• “Even where the contacts of the parent are imputed to the subsidiary based on the theory of alter ego, the trial court’s exercise of general, personal jurisdiction over the subsidiary must comport with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).