Capital One, N.A. v. Howard
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 275
Syllabus
The trial court did not err when it granted appellee's motion for summary judgment. Appellee met its burden under Civ.R. 56 to demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact existed to warrant a trial. Appellant did not respond to the motion, and hence did not meet his burden. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An appellate court does not sit to adjudicate de novo the factual issues” raised in a case
- discussing similar issue in context of patent law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.