Skip to main content
· 7/3/1986

Capital Newspapers Division of the Hearst Corp. v. Burns

Citations

  • 67 N.Y.2d 562
  • 505 N.Y.S.2d 576
  • 496 N.E.2d 665
  • 13 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2237
  • 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that exemptions are to be narrowly construed to provide maximum access, and the agency seeking to prevent disclosure carries the burden of demonstrating that the requested material falls squarely within an exemption
  • stating that exemptions are to be narrowly construed to provide maximum access, and the agency seeking to prevent disclosure carries the burden of demonstrating that the requested material falls squarely within an exemption
  • stating that exemptions are to be narrowly construed to provide maximum access, and the agency seeking to prevent disclosure carries the burden of demonstrating that the requested material falls squarely within an exemption
  • quoting, id. 109 A.D.2d 92, 96, 490 N.Y.S.2d 651 [3rd Dept.1985]
  • “narrowly specific” purpose of section 50-a is to prevent “ ‘fishing expeditions’ ”
  • \Nor has intervenor satisfied his burden of proving exemption under clause (iv) because his assertion that he will suffer 'economic and personal hardship' if the 'Lost Time Report' is released to the newspaper is conclusory and not supported by any facts.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.