Capital Mortgage Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, following institution of comparative negligence in Michigan, accountant malpractice claims were not completely barred by client’s negligence
• declined to follow National Surety because comparative fault has less harsh consequences than contributory negligence
• “Interest from the date of injury to the date of filing the complaint is an award that is within the purview of the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).