Capital Construction, LLC v. Nicholas Hanzlik
Syllabus
In this appeal from judgment following a bench trial on a breach-of-contract claim related to the parties' storm-damage repair contract, appellants assert the district court erred by improperly placing the burden on appellants to introduce affirmative evidence to demonstrate that the liquidated-damages clause was unenforceable. Because we agree the district court erred in this respect, we reverse and remand for the district court to apply the correct evidentiary burden.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.