Skip to main content
· 6/10/2015

Capital City Real Estate, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Subscribing to Policy Number: Arte018240

Citations

  • 788 F.3d 375
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9662
  • 2015 WL 3606861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding insurer had a duty to defend an additional insured when the underlying suit alleged facts that fell within the policy’s coverage, even when named insured was no longer a direct defendant in the suit
  • \Maryland law applies ordinary contract principles to insurance contracts\
  • interpreting a similar additional insured endorsement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Gregory, Shedd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.