Skip to main content
· 2/15/1978

Capital City First National Bank v. Rude

Citations

  • 567 F.2d 1367
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the determination whether the action should 8 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAII REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** proceed without the absentee, and therefore, the determination of indispensability itself under [HRCP] Rule 19(b
  • additional important factor supporting dismissal was fact that case was only seven months old and “only preliminary discovery had been undertaken and no trial date had been set. Thus, very little duplication of effort would be necessary if the case were refiled in state court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Hill, Roney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.