Capital Asset Research Corp. v. Finnegan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it was impossible for the Court to say” that the information met the definition of a “trade secret” because the plaintiff failed to present evidence that the information derived economic value from an element of secrecy that is known only to plaintiff and its employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).