CAPITAL ASSET MANAGMENT, LLC v. MELANIE J. TABRAUE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a cook and caretaker for railway workers was “not engaged in the production of goods for commerce”
• finding no individual coverage where a plaintiff “regularly handled” supplies and products “that originated outside of New York”
• “There is no single concept of interstate commerce which can be applied to every federal statute regulating commerce”
• “The automotive parts were removed from the flow of interstate commerce when they arrived at the auto parts stores.”
• “An employee is subject to individual coverage only if he is directly and regularly engaged in interstate commerce.”
• “In the [FLSA], Congress did not intend that the regulation of hours and wages should extend to the furthest reaches of federal authority.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).