Skip to main content
· 7/5/1995

Federal Case

Citations

  • 59 F.3d 884
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 8852
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5136
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the district court should review for procedural 5 compliance with the statute”
  • “[t]hough the parties 13 may call the procedure a ‘motion for summary judgment’ in order to obtain a calendar date from 14 the district court’s case management clerk, the procedure is, in substance, an appeal from an 15 administrative determination, not a summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.