Capiolo v. Stuart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he legislative history of section 388 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law indicates that the Legislature intended to enlarge the vehicle owner’s vicarious liability and not to draw a line at the border”
• “The legislative history of section 388 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law indicates that the Legislature intended to enlarge the vehicle own er’s vicarious liability and not to draw the line at the border.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).