Cape Royal Realty, Inc. v. Kroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the trial court could use Rule 1.530 to rehear a “final order dismissing [plaintiff’s] case for failure to prosecute”
• recognizing the trial court could use Rule 1.530 to rehear a “final order dismissing [plaintiff's] case for failure to prosecute”
• recognizing the trial court could use Rule 1.530 to rehear a “final order dismissing [plaintiff's] case for failure to prosecute”
• “[Tjrial court has the power and authority to completely alter or change its final judgment or order... Langer v. Aerovias, S.A., 584 So.2d 175, 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991
• “We find that Kroll’s motion to set aside the order of dismissal for lack of prosecution .... was intended to operate as a Rule 1.530 motion for rehearing. Upon the timely filing of a petition for rehearing (as was done in the instant case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).