Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Leal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding cer-tiorari review was premature because no irreparable harm had been demonstrated where the order under review merely required documents to be produced for an in camera inspection and no discovery had yet been ordered
• denying as premature a certiorari petition seeking review of an order requiring the submission of documents for an in camera inspection
• denying certiorari as premature where order simply required documents be submitted to court for in camera review
• denying as premature a petition for writ of certiorari that sought review of an order requiring the submission of documents to the court for in camera inspection
• order compelling hospital to submit documents for an in camera inspection for the purpose of determining privilege was premature where court had not yet ordered hospital to produce such documents to the opposing party
• “Generally, if there is a question as to whether certain discovery is protected by the peer review privilege, the trial court should hold an in camera inspection to determine if the materials are protected prior to compelling discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).