Skip to main content
· 10/14/2003

Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, U.S., L.L.C. v. John Nackel

Citations

  • 346 F.3d 360
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20864
  • 2003 WL 22331670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a New York choice-of-law provision “would be reasonable, and hence enforceable, if [plaintiff’s] ‘principal place of business’ were in New York”
  • “[I]n evaluating whether the parties have entered into a valid arbitration agreement, the court must look to state law principles.”
  • “Courts should be aware that a dismissal renders an order appealable under [FAA] § 16(a)(3), while the granting of a stay [or other intermediary action] is an unappealable interlocutory order under § 16(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Miner, Per Curiam, Straub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.