Canyon Country Store v. Bracey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 78-27-56 does not require written findings when awarding attorney fees
• holding that section 78-27-56 does not require written findings when awarding attorney fees
• recognizing incurred attorney fees for a prevailing party as “an item of consequential damages flowing from the insurer’s breach of contract”
• stating that, while the plaintiff’s method of calculating damages was sufficient for the jury to render a verdict, it was “too speculative to allow for the addition of prejudgment interest”
• refusing to award prejudgment interest in part because of “the amount of uncertainty involved in determining an actual loss”
• \ 'Rea sonableness' is generally the standard when the basis for recovery is a statute or a contract.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).